The other day, I heard Rep. Cynthia Something from Georgia speak. She is a professional politician, by virtue of her vagina and her pronounced and dark, Afro (as in Africa, not Afrodite) features. She was criticizing ‘the other party’ for conspiring to prevent more ‘black folks’ from representing ‘their people’ in the US Congress.

This is very interesting. I suppose this means that the few Whities who vote for her do not expect to be represented because politicians like her come to Congress to represent a race, not the people who live in her district. This also means that all Whities who do not vote for her are racist and all Darkies who do not vote for her are Uncle Toms.

State implemented terrorism is no terrorism, it appears.

Incidentally, the first state sponsored use of 'airplanes flying into buildings' was organized by the US gov't on Clinton's watch - and applauded by politicans on both sides of the bi-partisan aisles. The target was peaceful Belgrade, the capital of the one Balkan country that was NEVER a US enemy and on US' side when it counted. Serb 'partisans' rescued and sheltered hundreds of downed US pilots in WW2. It's the country that, even when under communist, rule refused to join the Soviet-led Warsaw pact.

So, against that country, the US gov't unleashed a campaign of savage bombing, including bombing the private residence of that country's leader. And, one faithful day, remote-controlled little planes, carrying thousand-pound payloads of high explosives, flew through the windows of the local TV station and exploded inside the building, killing innocent civilians, including - belive it or not - men, women and children.

Now... was THAT terrorism?

Whatever it was, creepy politicians and their propaganda accessories: Mitch McConnell, Lieberman, Lantos, Rush, Crystol, Biden and so on - they all applauded it and they all asked for more.

Unity 08

I found these new site Unity 08. Apparently, the guys 'in the middle' are suggesting the replacement of the current 2-party system with a true one-party version of the party system. I left the following at their message board:

So, let's give it a little thought. We got this so-called two-party system now that's giving us no choice whatsoever on all issues we care about. And some smart people came up with this grand idea of getting us an official one-party system. Why shouldn’t I be unimpressed? Note: the real solution is, of course, the zero-party alternatives. Clever. No?

The two-party acts as the one-party already on everything that matters: multi-culture, income taxation, illegal and increased immigration, disadvantageous foreign trade, encouraging American jobs outsourcing, technology and high-tech jobs export, increased globalization, Iraq occupation, Israel subservience, constantly growing the government, constantly reducing individual liberty and initiative, constantly pushing toward more collectivism, always for interventionism abroad and never for protecting the jobs of Americans, always for more intrusive intervention into people's personal lives, more do-goodism and less individualism. We call the above 'bi-partisan' issues and they continue on the path set probably ever since Lincoln, regardless of which party is in power at any given time. I call the party on power the DemoGOPs and they should go or this nation goes.

Then we have the so-called 'wedge issues'. Like the GOPs screaming against 'gay marriage' and the Demos decrying 'tax breaks for the rich'. Not that any so-called party does anything about these but they help keep the voters focused on peripheral distractions while the 2 so-called partisan parties are in complete agreement on 99% of everything.

So... these guys find... too much division and partisanship? I guess I couldn't stop laughing for a long time if they expressed this in a more humorous way - they are planning to replace the 2-party which is really a one-party with a one-party? I am soooo overwhelmed and energized :))))

Will this post survive the bi-partisan censorship? I hope it does but the odds seem to be against it.