Bush continues to repeat that 'Saddam' did not allow the inspectors in Iraq and that he 'did not disclose'.

Anyone whose memory goes back a few years recalls that Saddam actually allowed full access to UN inspectors. I even recall the inspectors frustrations for not finding anything interesting and Baradei BEGGING the Bushies to just tell them where to go and look for those weapons of massive distraction. The inspectors were allowed access everywhere in Iraq, including Saddam's palaces and their basements.

As for the 'did not disclose' part, the Iraqi government provided thousands of pages and dozens of CD-ROMS of evidence of the WMD non-existence. As soon as the documentation arrived, the US took custody of it and only provided a small subset to the other members of the Security Council. Then, the Bushfreak went on the teevee and claimed that Saddam did not 'disclose'.

Any way you look at it, from that time's perspective or from today's, the invasion of Iraq was an act of NAKED AGGRESSION. And the nakedness of it makes it obscene and it makes Bush a perpetrator and peddler of obscenities on a global scale.

Any politician who repeats the Bush line is a liar and a monster or a gullible idiot. Any media type who does not challenge the Bushfreak or the politicians who come up with the Bush line is a willing collaborator and moral monster or an unbelievably incompetent journalist.

Do YOU Want To Win the War in Iraq?

Apparently, Cheney's wife asked the Blitz (a CNN talking head) whether he wanted the US to 'win the war' in Iraq.

Firstly, there is no war in Iraq that's 'our war'. There is maybe a civil war caused by the Bush-ordered invasion and his experiments with make-believe dee-mock-rah-see but there is no US-Iraq war. Can 'we' win other country's civil war? I don't think so. Neither the local Sunnis nor the Shias are our enemies but we are theirs only because Bush sent our troops there to destroy their country and they are trying to expel us.

Now, that yous answered the question, and if you answered 'yes', please define 'victory' and explain why would 'victory' be desirable. What would be the fruits of our 'victory'? What is it that would make it worth the lives of 5000 or 10000 Americans and one trillion dollars or more?

My answer to the 'do you want 'us' to win?' stupid question is a loud and clear NO!!!

Going to Iraq was a stupid and criminal thing to begin with. Staying 'the course' in Iraq only makes it worse every day while more Americans are killed and more resources are wasted.

Can we possibly 'lose' in Iraq, if 'we' don't win? Not at all. We simply go home and maybe mind our business for a change. Bush and his Neocon handlers would definitely lose and maybe Israel if we bring our boys back home but America is not Bush and America is definitely not the Neofreaks or their beloved Israel.

By the way, if we go home no one would think that Iraq 'won'. What kind of victory would that be after we turned their country to rubble, killed their people by the hundreds of thousands and turned them against each other to a degree that a unified Iraq may not be possible ever again. These are the fruits of our 'victories' so far. 'Staying the course' brought nothing but death, ruin, misery and desperation to the people of Iraq.

Again: I DO NOT WISH US TO WIN IN IRAQ! I want our boys back home... 4 years ago and I want justice brought to Bush and those who control him.